Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

(Download) "Cooke and Others v. Woodrow" by United States Supreme Court " Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Cooke and Others v. Woodrow

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Cooke and Others v. Woodrow
  • Author : United States Supreme Court
  • Release Date : January 01, 1809
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 55 KB

Description

ERROR to the circuit court of the district of Columbia, in an action of trover brought by the plaintiffs in error for sundry household goods. A bill of exceptions stated that the plaintiffs on the trial produced in evidence to support their title to the goods, a certain paper writing signed by one John Withers, to which one John Pierson had subscribed his name as a witness, and offered parol evidence to prove that the subscribing witness 'had upwards of a year ago left the district of Columbia, and that before he left the said district he declared that he should go to the northward, that is to say, to Philadelphia or New-York, and said he had a wife in New-York. That the said subscribing witness went from the said district to Norfolk, and that when he got there he declared that he should go on further to the south, but where was not known, and the he has not been heard of by the witness for the last twelve months. It appeared that subpoena had been issued in this case, for the said subscribing witness, directed to the marshal of the district of Columbia, but he could not be found in the said district by the said marshal. The plaintiff then offered to prove the hand-writing of the subscribing witness and of the said John Withers to the said writting, but the court refused to permit the plaintiffs to produce evidence of the hand-writing of the said subscribing witness, and refused to permit the plaintiffs to prove the hand-writing of the said John Withers, otherwise than by the testimony of the said subscribing witness; to which refusal the plaintiffs excepted.' C. Simms, for the plaintiffs in error, suggested that this court must be satisfied by evidence (other than the declaration) that the sum in demand exceeded 100 dollars, exclusive of costs; and cited the rule made in the case of Course v. Stead's Executors, ante, vol. 1. p. 17.


Free PDF Books "Cooke and Others v. Woodrow" Online ePub Kindle